Brian Carlin (Sleep Medicine and Lung Health Consultants LLC, and Pittsburgh Critical Care Associates, Pittsburgh, PA, US), a valued member of our Editorial Board, discusses patient and physician perspectives on inhalation devices for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the need for ongoing education.
1. Could you tell us a little about the findings of the recent American Thoracic Society (ATS) survey regarding chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients’ understanding of their disease and how to correctly use their devices? (0:10)
2. Among patients, what were the preferred devices for COPD management? (1:30)
3. What unmet needs were identified by patients? And what were the findings of the ATS survey of pulmonologists’ perception of their knowledge and practices with delivery devices for COPD management? (1:57)
4. How can we improve education for patients and pulmonologists in these areas? (3:32)
Dhand R, Mahler DA, Carlin BW, Hanania NA, et al. Results of a Patient Survey Regarding COPD Knowledge, Treatment Experiences, and Practices With Inhalation Devices. Respir Care. 2018;63:833–39.
Braman SS, Carlin BW, Hanania NA, Mahler DA, et al. Results of a Pulmonologist Survey Regarding Knowledge and Practices With Inhalation Devices for COPD. Respir Care. 2018;63:840–48.
Speaker disclosure: Brian Carlin is on the executive committee for the National Lung Health Education Program (NLHEP), a non-profit organisation.
Filmed at the CHEST Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, US, October 2018.
Related Videos In COPD
Peter J Barnes, ERS 2020 – Smart Inhalers for COPD and Asthma
During the ERS International Congress 2020, it was great to catch up with our Editorial Board member, Prof. Peter J Barnes (Imperial College, London, UK), to continue the discussion around Smart Inhalers and how they could help optimise inhaler use in patients. Questions How common is poor adherence and inhaler technique in people with asthma […]
Henrik Hansen, ERS 2019 – Pulmonary Tele-rehabilitation Versus Conventional Rehabilitation (Part 1)
We met Henrik Hansen, from National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, at ERS 2019 to discuss his study results – 1-year follow-up of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus conventional pulmonary rehabilitation. Questions 1. What are the limitations of current pulmonary rehabilitation programmes? (0:05) 2. What are the potential advantages and limitations of tele-rehabilitation? (1:44) Speaker disclosures: Henrik Hansen […]
Henrik Hansen, ERS 2019 – Pulmonary Tele-rehabilitation Versus Conventional Rehabilitation (Part 2)
We met Henrik Hansen, from National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, at ERS 2019 to discuss his study results – 1-year follow-up of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus conventional pulmonary rehabilitation. Questions 1. Could you tell us a little about your recent clinical trial investigating tele-rehabilitation? (0:05) 2. Which patients are most likely to benefit from this approach? […]
Journal articles and more to your inbox
Get the latest clinical insights from touchRESPIRATORYSign me up!