Emerging Therapies for Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease

Emerging Therapies for Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease

US Respiratory Disease 2007
Published: October 2008
dots

Cystic Fibrosis and Current Care Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a common, life-shortening disease affecting tens of thousands of people in the US and worldwide (Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) registry statistics, 2005). It is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a membrane localized traffic adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP)-ase protein that functions as a chloride channel.

CFTR is also a regulator of many ion transport pathways (including non-CFTR chloride channels, sodium, bicarbonate, ATP, glutathione, and, potentially, other small molecules), and this protein helps to establish the content of the airway surface liquid (ASL) and of submucosal glandular secretions.1–7 Loss of CFTR activity in the airways initiates a chain of events including reduction in the ASL volume, dehydration and thickening of glandular mucus secretions, airway obstruction, chronic bacterial infection, and relentless inflammation, which together contribute to the development of bronchiectasis and eventual respiratory failure. Advances in supportive care have led to a steady increase in the average life expectancy of people with CF, with recent statistics demonstrating a median survival of over 37 years (CFF registry statistics, 2005). CF remains a devastating illness for many patients, with substantial numbers succumbing to the disease in childhood and early adulthood.

Pulmonary therapies are aimed at treating disease symptoms, including:

• regular chest clearance (through daily chest percussion—predominately by hand or vest);
• mucolytics (e.g. nebulized recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase);
• antibiotics (including cycled use of tobramycin for nebulization (TOBI®) in patients with respiratory tract cultures positive for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extending to oral and/or intravenous antibiotics for acute pulmonary exacerbations); and
• macrolide therapy, bronchodialators, and anti-inflammatories (oral and inhaled).8–14

Cumulatively, these therapies have led to a dramatic increase in the survival of CF patients. They also can create substantial and often confusing treatment regimens for patients who require regular daily attention for clear clinical benefits. Compliance can be extremely challenging across all age groups of CF patients and their families for a variety of reasons, and the limited number of comparative trials (that might simplify treatment) leaves CF care-givers with little evidence to guide choices between therapies. The result is often an escalating care plan as new therapies arise or symptoms increase, with the potential to further complicate daily care. Accumulating evidence from patient outcomes in several European CF care centers, and more recently from studies performed in the US, are leading to a more preventive, pre-symptomatic approach to CF care.15–22 This shift in care philosophy is well timed with the adoption of CF newborn screening in the US and abroad, and will be of significant benefit to CF patients and their families.23,24 It also raises many questions regarding how to adapt therapies to the infant and toddler CF population, and how to demonstrate efficacy in these difficult to study patients.

Understanding of Cystic Fibrosis Airway Biology—Application to New Pulmonary Strategies
The CFTR gene was identified in 1989, and since that historic achievement an immense amount of work has been performed to understand how this single genetic defect results in the complex clinical picture that characterizes CF.1–3 While there are many questions that remain to be answered regarding the steps between genetic defect and airway disease, the breadth of knowledge gained regarding CF pathogenesis has helped researchers to identify numerous strategies directed toward central causes of CF. These approaches include: normalization of sodium, chloride, and/or mucociliary transport in the airways; direct gene transfer to the airway epithelia; and restoration of mutant CFTR function through genotype-specific, small-molecule therapies. Each of these therapeutic strategies has advanced to clinical trials in CF patients, and positive results have the potential to extend CF therapy from ‘symptom-based’ to treatment of the underlying causes of CF lung disease.

Normalization of Sodium, Chloride, and/or Mucociliary Transport
Normally, the composition and volume of the ASL layer that bathes and maximizes ciliary function is delicately balanced between sodium absorption, which is believed to drive chloride and water transport from the luminal to the blood compartment, and chloride secretion, which helps to hydrate the lumenal compartment.25–33 Evidence also suggests that the source of this fluid is in large part in the submucosal glands, where CFTR expression is significantly higher than in surface epithelial cells.34–37 In the CF airway, loss of CFTR function leads to loss of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-stimulated chloride conductance via CFTR and the outwardly rectified chloride channel (ORCC), which is positively linked to CFTR,38 alteration of submucosal gland secretions, and enhanced sodium absorption from the epithelial surface. The increase in sodium transport is believed to drive dehydration of the ASL compartment, which perturbs normal mucociliary clearance and sets the stage for the development of mucus plaques that adhere to the underlying epithelium.32,39 This mucus stasis has been postulated to make the CF airway susceptible to bacterial infection, and potentially begin the cascade of CF lung disease. This system is not without potential back-up ion transport pathways that are protective. Work by Boucher and colleagues supports a model in which ATP released from the airway epithelium in response to shear stress (such as the breathing cycle or coughing) can bind to P2Y2 receptors that are normally found on the apical surface of airway epithelial cells.32,40–44 Stimulation of these G-proteincoupled receptors raises cell calcium, which in turn activates calciumactivated chloride channels (CaCCs) and can partially restore mucociliary clearance. However, over time this system is believed to fail (possibly due to accumulated damage and/or negative effects of recurrent viral infections), leading to the typical sequelae of CF lung disease.32,45

References:
  1. Rommens JM, et al., Science, 1989;245(4922):1059 65.
  2. Kerem B, et al., Science, 1989;245(4922):1073 80.
  3. Kerem E, Kerem B, Pediatr Pulmonol, 1996;22(6):387 95.
  4. Rowe SM, Miller S, Sorscher EJ, N Engl J Med, 2005;352(19): 1992 2001.
  5. Pilewski JM, Frizzell RA, Physiol Rev, 1999;79(Suppl. 1):S215 55.
  6. Davis PB, Pediatr Rev, 2001;22(8):257 64.
  7. Ratjen F, Doring G, Lancet, 2003;361(9358):681 9.
  8. Saiman L, et al., JAMA, 2003;290(13):1749 56.
  9. Ramsey BW, et al., N Engl J Med, 1999;340(1):23 30.
  10. Fuchs HJ, et al., N Engl J Med, 1994;331(10):637 42.
  11. McCool FD, Rosen MJ, Chest, 2006;129(Suppl. 1):250S 59S.
  12. van der Schans C, Prasad A, Main E, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2000(2):CD001401.
  13. Yankaskas JR, et al., Chest, 2004;125(Suppl. 1):1S 39S.
  14. Chmiel JF, Konstan MW, Treat Respir Med, 2005;4(4):255 73.
  15. Gibson RL, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003;167(6):841 9.
  16. Littlewood JM, et al., Lancet, 1985;1(8433):865.
  17. Valerius NH, Koch C, Hoiby N, Lancet, 1991;338(8769):725 6.
  18. Wiesemann HG, et al., Pediatr Pulmonol, 1998;25(2):88 92.
  19. Ratjen F, Doring G, Nikolaizik WH, Lancet, 2001;358(9286):983 4.
  20. Ratjen F, Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2001;17(2):93 6.
  21. Starner TD, McCray PB Jr, Ann Intern Med, 2005;143(11):816 22.
  22. Rosenfeld M, Ramsey BW, Gibson RL, Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2003;9(6):492 7.
  23. Grosse SD, et al., J Pediatr, 2006;149(3):362 6.
  24. van den Akker-van Marle ME, et al., Pediatrics, 2006;118(3): 896 905.
  25. Tarran R, et al., J Gen Physiol, 2002;120(3):407 18.
  26. Tarran R, et al., Ped Pulmonol Suppl, 2001;A71.
  27. Tarran R, et al., J Biol Chem, 2005;280(42):35751 9.
  28. Lazarowski ER, et al., J Biol Chem, 2004;279(35):36855 64.
  29. Stutts MJ, et al., Science, 1995;269(5225):847 50.
  30. Matsui H, et al., J Clin Invest, 1998;102(6):1125 31.
  31. Matsui H, et al., Cell, 1998;95(7):1005 15. li>Boucher RC, Annu Rev Med, 2007;58:157 70.
  32. Boucher RC, J Intern Med, 2007;261(1):5 16.
  33. Ballard ST, et al., Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2002;283(2):329 35.
  34. Ballard ST, et al., Am J Physiol, 1999;277(4 Pt 1):L694 9.
  35. Joo NS, et al., J Biol Chem, 2002;277(52):50710 15.
  36. Joo NS, et al., J Biol Chem, 2002;277(31):28167 75.
  37. Schwiebert EM, et al., Cell, 1995;81(7):1063 73.
  38. Matsui H, et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006;103(48):18131 6.
  39. Donaldson SH, et al., Mol Med, 2000;6(11):969 82.
  40. Button B, Picher M, Boucher RC, J Physiol, 2007;580(Pt 2): 577 92.
  41. Tarran R, Button B, Boucher RC, Annu Rev Physiol, 2006;68:543 61.
  42. Tarran R, et al., J Gen Physiol, 2006;127(5):591 604.
  43. Paradiso AM, et al., J Gen Physiol, 2001;117(1):53 67.
  44. Tarran R, et al., J Biol Chem, 2005;280(42):35751 9.
  45. Knowles M, Gatzy J, Boucher R, N Engl J Med, 1981;305(25): 1489 95.
  46. Knowles MR, et al., Am Rev Respir Dis, 1981;124(4):484 90.
  47. Knowles MR, Paradiso AM, Boucher RC, Hum Gene Ther, 1995;6(4):445 55.
  48. Sood N, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003;167(2):158 63.
  49. Knowles MR, et al., Adv Exp Med Biol, 1991;290:119 28, discussion 129 32.
  50. Hirsh AJ, et al., Design, J Med Chem, 2006;49(14):4098 4115.
  51. Hirsh AJ, et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2004;311(3):929 38.
  52. Olivier KN, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1996;154(1):217 23.
  53. Bennett WD, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1996;153(6 Pt 1): 1796 1801.
  54. Knowles MR, Clarke LL, Boucher RC, N Engl J Med, 1991;325(8): 533 8.
  55. Zeitlin PL, et al., Chest, 2004;125(1):143 9.
  56. Deterding RR, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2007.
  57. Elkins MR, Bye PT, Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2006;12(6):445 52.
  58. Donaldson SH, et al., N Engl J Med, 2006;354(3):241 50.
  59. Wills P, Greenstone M, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006;(2):CD002996.
  60. Bye PT, Elkins MR, Paediatr Respir Rev, 2007;8(1):30 39.
  61. Johnson LG, et al., Nat Genet, 1992;2(1):21 5.
  62. Aitken ML, et al., Hum Gene Ther, 2001;12(15):1907 16.
  63. Alton EW, et al., Lancet, 1999;353(9157):947 54.
  64. Boucher RC, et al., Hum Gene Ther, 1994;5(5):615 39.
  65. Hyde SC, et al., Gene Ther, 2000;7(13):1156 65.
  66. Moss RB, et al., Chest, 2004;125(2):509 21.
  67. Ruiz FE, et al., Hum Gene Ther, 2001;12(7):751 61.
  68. Zabner J, et al., Cell, 1993;75(2):207 16.
  69. Griesenbach U, Geddes DM, Alton EW, Gene Ther, 2006;13(14):1061 7.
  70. Ziady AG, Davis PB, Curr Opin Pharmacol, 2006;6(5):515 21.
  71. Alton EW, Proc Am Thorac Soc, 2004;1(4):296 301.
  72. Flotte TR, Curr Gene Ther, 2005;5(3):361 6.
  73. Snyder RO, Flotte TR, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2002;13(5):418 23.
  74. Sirninger J, et al., Hum Gene Ther, 2004;15(9):832 41.
  75. Konstan MW, et al., Hum Gene Ther, 2004;15(12):1255 69.
  76. Rowe SM, Clancy JP, Curr Opin Pediatr, 2006;18(6):604 13.
  77. Rubenstein RC, Zeitlin PL, Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2000;278(2):C259 67.
  78. Rubenstein RC, Zeitlin PL, Am J Respir Crit Care Med,1998;157(2):484 90.
  79. Wilschanski M, et al., N Engl J Med, 2003;349(15):1433 41. li>Wilschanski M, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000;161 (3 Pt 1):860 65.
  80. Bedwell DM, et al., Nat Med, 1997;3(11):1280 84.
  81. Howard M, Frizzell RA, Bedwell DM, Nat Med, 1996;2(4):467 9.
  82. Du M, et al., J Mol Med, 2002;80(9):595 604.
  83. Manuvakhova M, Keeling K, Bedwell DM, RNA, 2000;6(7):1044 55.
  84. Barton-Davis ER, et al., J Clin Invest, 1999;104(4):375 81.
  85. Clancy J, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001;163(7):1683 92.
  86. Clancy JP, et al., Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol, 2007.
  87. Linde L, et al., J Clin Invest, 2007;117(3):683 92.
  88. Rowe SM, et al., Ped Pulmol Suppl, 2006;29:A55.
  89. Welch EM, et al., Nature, 2007;447(7140):87 91.
  90. Hirawat S, et al., J Clin Pharmacol, 2007;47(4):430 44.
  91. Kerem E, et al., Ped Pulmol Suppl, 2006;29:A242.
  92. Pedemonte N, et al., J Clin Invest, 2005;115(9):2564 71.
  93. Yang H, et al., J Biol Chem, 2003;278(37):35079 85.
  94. Sammelson RE, et al.,Bioorg Med Chem Lett, 2003;13(15): 2509 12.
  95. Caci E, et al., Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, 2003;285(1):L180 88.
  96. Galietta LJ, et al., J Biol Chem, 2001;276(23):19723 8.
  97. Brown CR, et al., Cell Stress Chaperones, 1996;1(2):117 25.
  98. Van Goor F, et al., Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,2006;290(6):L1117 30.
  99. Hwang TC, et al., Am J Physiol, 1997;273(3 Pt 1):C988 98.
  100. Wang W, et al., J Biol Chem, 2005;280(25):23622 30.
  101. Bebok Z, et al., J Physiol, 2005;569(Pt 2):601 15. Epub Oct 6 2005.
  102. Wilschanski M, et al., Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2006;174(7): 787 94.

add new comment Comments


Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!

Copyright® 2004 - 2010 Business Briefings, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Touch Respiratory is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatement recommendations.