Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Compliance - Is Socioeconomic Background Relevant?

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Compliance - Is Socioeconomic Background Relevant?

European Respiratory Disease 2007 - Issue I
Published: October 2008
dots

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first choice of treatment in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients. This has been the case for the past 25 years. As it is a self-administered treatment, its efficacy is critically dependent on the patient’s willingness to use the device and apply the nasal mask during sleep (patient/sociodemographic related compliance).

Overall, compliance is high compared with other chronic therapies. There are, nevertheless, huge variations from one patient to another, presumably related to side effects as well as to the perception of clinical improvement. Patients using CPAP commonly report significant side effects, such as nasal obstruction, dry nose or throat, and discomfort associated with cold air (these side effects affect CPAP-related compliance). Most may be managed when education, adaptation to treatment and appropriate medical and technical follow-up are adequately implemented. In Europe, CPAP compliance has been reported to be relatively high – frequently above five hours per night on average – which reflects a compromise between compliance and longterm tolerance.1

There have been several studies looking at compliance determinants. In long-term studies, the most consistent correlation of daily use of CPAP was with objective measures of OSA severity at diagnosis, such as the apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI), movement arousal index or nocturnal oxygen saturation (disease-related compliance). A patient’s initial experience with CPAP treatment, and in particular the degree of improvement in sleep during CPAP titration, may also be crucial factors in determining their subsequent use.2 In most studies, multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) or score of sleepiness at diagnosis were not significantly correlated with subsequent use of CPAP. The combination of factors contributing to the variance of the rate of use explained less than 10% of the variance, suggesting that long-term compliance is multifactorial or affected by other factors not included in the analysis, like the perceived clinical benefit.3 It has also been shown that intensive support when initiating the treatment is critical and provides a substantial benefit in terms of daily use.1 Because CPAP is an aid not a cure, significant behaviour change on the part of the patient and the patient’s family is necessary. Indeed, the sleep community is beginning to recognise the importance of the ‘human factor’ in CPAP compliance, e.g. the beliefs and behaviour of the patient, and professional/patient interactions.4

References:
  1. Pepin JL, Krieger J, Rodenstein D, et al., Effective compliance during the first 3 months of continuous positive airway pressure. A European prospective study of 121 patients, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999;160:1124 9.
  2. Drake CL, Day R, Hudgel D, et al., Sleep during titration predicts continuous positive airway pressure compliance, Sleep, 2003;26:308 11.
  3. Collard Ph, Pieters Th, Aubert G, et al., Compliance with nasal CPAP in obstructive sleep apnea patients, Sleep Medicine Reviews, 1997;1:33 44.
  4. Stepnowsky CJ Jr, Marfler MR, Ancoli-Israel S, Determinants of nasal CPAP compliance, Sleep Medicine, 2002;3:239 47.
  5. Lewis KE, Seale L, Bartle IE, et al., Early predictors of CPAP use for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, Sleep, 2004;27:134 8.
  6. Stepnowsky CJ Jr, Bardwell WA, Moore PJ, et al., Psychologic correlates of compliance with continuous positive airway pressure, Sleep, 2002;25:758 62.
  7. Stepnowsky CJ Jr, Marler MR, Palau J, Brooks JA, Socialcognitive correlates of CPAP adherence in experienced users, Sleep Medicine, 2006;7:350 6.
  8. Salorio CF, White DA, Piccirillo J, et al., Learning, memory, and executive control in individuals with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 2002;24:93 100.
  9. Randerath WJ, Kroll B, Schwickert M, et al., Self assessment by patients of impairment caused by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2000;125:348 51.
  10. Verbraecken J, Lins M, Van Hoof K, et al., Quality of life (QOL) and CPAP compliance in workers and employees with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome, Eur Respir J, 2005;26(supplement 49):112s.
  11. Fein O, The influence of social class on health status: American and British research on health inequalities, J Gen Intern Med, 1995;10:577 86.
  12. Prescott E, Godtfredsen N, Vestbo J, Osler M, Social position and mortality from diseases in males and females, Eur Respir J, 2003;21:821 26.
  13. Verbraecken J, Lins M, Van Hoof K, et al., CPAP compliance and quality of life (QOL) according to educational level in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), Eur Respir J, 2005;26(supplement 49):724s.
  14. Rasmussen FV, Borchsenius L, Winslcw JB, Associations between housing conditions, smoking habits and ventilatory function in men with clean jobs, Scand J Respir Dis, 1978;59:264 76.
  15. Edinger JD, Carwile S, Miller P, et al., Psychological status, syndromatic measures, and compliance with nasal CPAP therapy for sleep apnea, Percept Motor Skills, 1994;78:1116 8.
  16. Ball EM, Banks MB, Determinants of compliance with nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment applied in a community setting, Sleep Medicine, 2001;1:195 205.
  17. Hoy CJ, Vennelle M, Kingshott RN, et al., Can intensive support improve continuous positive airway pressure use in patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome? Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999;159:1096 1100.

add new comment Comments


Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!

Copyright® 2004 - 2010 Business Briefings, Ltd. All rights reserved.
Touch Respiratory is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatement recommendations.